Those with disabilities face a terrible choice: whether to eat or breathe.

In order to make ends meet, activists believe that disabled people in Scotland are being forced to choose between having a dwelling that is warm and being able to breathe properly.

Not too long ago, the Scottish Independent Living Coalition (SILC) presented a study report in which they issued a warning about “unrelenting assaults” on the rights of handicapped persons in Scotland.

In recent years, the prices associated with the medical equipment that a person who uses a wheelchair needs have allegedly “gone through the sky,” according to this individual.

Both the government of the United Kingdom and the government of Scotland have expressed their intention to do all in their power to significantly improve the quality of life of handicapped people in their respective nations and have stated their intentions to do so.

According to the study conducted by SILC, an increase in the cost of living is a key concern for disabled people in Scotland. These individuals may be forced to make “stark choices” on whether or not they would use medical equipment and assistive technology and how often they will use them. It may be necessary to make a choice between being able to afford food and being able to afford the electricity necessary to run essential medical equipment. One alternative is to make this decision.

It states that some people have to make a decision between “eating and breathing, putting their health in jeopardy, with the final conclusion of having to go into hospital or residential care.”

The Scottish Independent Litigation Commission (SILC) was the body in responsibility of producing the report, and they did so on behalf of the Scottish Human Rights Commission (SHRC).

During an interview for the program Good Morning Scotland that is aired on BBC Radio Scotland, the Chief Executive Officer of the SHRC, Jan Savage, stated that handicapped individuals should not be required to make a decision regarding whether or not they should use medical equipment, which may in certain circumstances “enable them physically to breathe,” or whether or not they should consume nutrient-dense cuisine. Savage made this statement while discussing the fact that handicapped individuals should not be required to decide whether or not they should use medical equipment.

A watchdog organization has expressed concern that the government is not providing appropriate help for people with disabilities.

According to a person who lives with multiple sclerosis (MS), people who are physically disabled are frequently on the edge of taking their own lives.

A guy who is physically impaired shares his concern about the rising expense of food throughout the course of the next winter.

The commission will meet on Monday in Geneva to examine the new findings, one of which is an 84-page evidence document that was developed by the United Kingdom Independent Mechanism, which is formed of human rights organisations from all throughout the United Kingdom. The commission will meet on Monday to discuss the new findings. On Monday, the panel will get together to discuss and analyze the recent results.

Paula Fummey is a local of the Castlemilk neighborhood in Glasgow, and she participates in the activities of the Glasgow Disability Alliance. Even though Fummey uses a wheelchair, the Glasgow Disability Alliance is open to people of all different levels of ability. She insists that she needs six different pieces of medical equipment in order to “survive,” despite the fact that the cost of power is continuing to climb, and she cites this as evidence for her claim.

“It is extremely vital that I have them for my freedom, but you do think about it when you are plugging them in each day,” she remarked on the BBC Radio program Good Morning Scotland in Scotland. “You do think about it when you are plugging them in each day.” When you are daily responsible for plugging them in, the thought does cross your mind. “In order for me to keep my freedom, having them is an absolute must on my part.”

“I use my wheelchair to move about; if I didn’t have it, I’d go doo lally; I don’t know what I would do with myself.” “I utilize my wheelchair to get out and about.” — “I would be confined to my bed all day long if I didn’t use my wheelchair; I use it to go about town.” — “I use it to get out and about.” If I couldn’t use my wheelchair, I would have no choice but to spend the entire day confined to my bed.

In addition, she utilizes on a daily basis a monitoring hoist and an electronic hospital bed, both of which provide her assistance in the process of recuperation and are essential to her progress.

Ms. Fummey has not only had to deal with the high cost of the power, but also with a wide range of other challenges. She chose to keep herself warm throughout the winter season of the previous year by wrapping herself in a duvet rather than turning on the heater in her apartment. She did this instead of turning on the heating so that she might save money.

She made the comment, “I would rather charge my wheelchair so that I may go out and about and put garments on if I start to get chilly.” This was a reference to her wheelchair or other mobility aid. You said, “I would rather charge my wheelchair so that I may move about,” which shows that you value mobility above everything else. “It’s easier on the schedule.”

Not a viable option to consider.

Because of the high expense of living, Ms. Fummey is unable to attend as many social gatherings as she used to be able to. This is a significant change from her previous situation. She went to watch her brother perform as a comedian on one of her excursions, and the cab price alone set her back a total of £55. Her trip was one of the most expensive ones she took.

She went on to say that “until I can get there in my chair, I tend not to go places because it’s just too costly,” and she went on to discuss the reasons why this was the case. Her next comment was that “unless I can get there in my chair, I tend not to go places because it’s just too exorbitant.” She said that she did not go anywhere since it was just too expensive for her to do so.

You just do not have the discretionary cash available to do it any more, which implies that you really do need to evaluate whether or not you want to continue participating in these activities.

According to a spokeswoman for the government of the United Kingdom, the administration is dedicated to the adoption of policies that would make society a more “inclusive and accessible environment for all individuals with disabilities.” Among these measures is the revision of the mechanism that chooses recipients for grants for health care and disability.

During the crisis that was brought on by the continuous increase in the cost of living, a spokesperson for the Scottish government said that the administration was doing all necessary within its “powers and set budgets” to ensure that people were aided in any way that they could.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *